ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Force in robotic thoracic surgery -a one year analysis of DaVinci 5 force feedback.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Precision Medicine and Artificial Intelligence in Next-Generation Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Applications, Therapeutic Outcomes, and Implementation Strategies.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical performance of da Vinci 5 versus Xi for robotic anatomic lung resection: a propensity-weighted analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic intracorporeal anastomosis enhances technical precision while reducing surgeon cognitive load: a prospective multicentre study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Observational
- Impact of the force feedback feature on transoral robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Force sensing and haptic feedback in robotic surgery: a bibliometric and knowledge-mapping analysis of technological evolution and translational trajectories.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Review
- Beyond the console: surgeon's perceptions & attitudes towards robotic surgery in Saudi Arabia: a nationwide cross- sectional survey.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Transoral Robotic Cleft Palate Surgery: Communication-Related Outcomes and Feasibility.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Quantitative analysis of da Vinci 5 force feedback technology in robotic rectal surgery: a preliminary pilot study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Feasibility of intraoperative force quantification during robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a prospective case series using integrated force-sensing technology.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- First Japanese Experience of Robotic-Assisted Low Anterior Resection Using the da Vinci 5: Incorporating Force Feedback and Case Insights in Rectal Cancer Surgery.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Safety of Continuous Force Feedback in Robotic Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lack of tactile sensation has been a limitation of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS). The da Vinci 5 System (launched in 2024) integrates force feedback (FFB), a technology that measures instrument-tip forces and relays them to console hand controllers. This study characterizes forces applied during RATS and evaluates the impact of FFB. Da Vinci 5 system data for all RATS procedures using FFB instruments performed in the US between March 29, 2024 and April 30, 2025 were reviewed. Common thoracic surgeries were analyzed, including lung resections, mediastinal, esophageal, and diaphragmatic procedures. Mean instrument-tip forces (Newtons, N) were compared by procedure and instrument type. Forces and time spent above > 6.5 N were compared across FFB settings. Data from 444 procedures by 73 unique surgeons were analyzed. Median forces during lung resections (1.45 N anatomic resection, 1.42 N wedge) were significantly lower compared to mediastinal procedures (1.61 N), esophageal (1.74 N), and diaphragm surgery (1.59 N) (p < 0.001). Higher forces were measured with the use of retraction (Cadiere or Fenestrated Bipolar) than dissecting (Maryland) instruments (p < 0.001). Median forces decreased progressively with higher FFB settings (off, 1.79 N vs. low, 1.67 N vs. medium, 1.45 N vs. high, 1.32 N, p < 0.001). Proportion of duration at force > 6.5 N similarly declined with increased FFB setting (p < 0.001). FFB technology is associated with reduced average and peak instrument forces during RATS, particularly at medium and high settings. Retraction instruments experienced the highest forces. Further research is needed to define optimal force thresholds and clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.