ArticleScientific reports2025
Decoding of image properties from single-trial visual evoked potentials recorded by ultra-high-density EEG.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Increasing EEG electrode density improves decoding of visual categories and source localization: an exploratory ultra-high-density EEG study.Communications engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) recorded by encephalography (EEG) allow us to study the neuronal activity non-invasively and in high temporal resolution. Traditionally, EEG analyses have relied on univariate group-level statistics and trial averaging to detect effects. However, recent advances in high-density EEG enable the investigation of brain responses at the single-subject and single-trial level. In this study, we combine ultra-high-density (uHD) EEG with cross-validated single-trial decoding to bridge both approaches, improving generalizability and reproducibility. Study participants were shown a diverse set of random images while 512 channels from the uHD system recorded their EEG over the occipital lobe. Image properties (contrast, hue, luminance, saturation and spatial frequency) were extracted for each stimuli and VEPs were used for decoding these properties in a cross-validated regression analysis. Additionally, the same data were spatially subsampled to investigate the impact of spatial resolution and electrode density on the decoding performance. Image properties could be decoded from single-trial VEPs, with contrast, saturation and spatial frequency providing the best decoding performances. Grand average decoding performance across all image properties and subjects yielded a Pearson's r of 0.50 between predicted and actual image property score. Greater electrode density improves decoding performance compared to standard EEG as well as subsampled configurations. Image properties robustly modulate early components of the VEP. Importantly, these modulations are pronounced enough to allow for single-trial decoding. Our analyses highlight the importance of electrode density with improvements in decoding performance extending even below 10 mm of inter-electrode distance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.