ArticleScientific reports2025
Advancing real-time validation of automotive software systems via continuous integration and intelligent failure analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the automotive industry, a rigorous testing process based on ISO 26,262 is carried out at various stages of the V-model to ensure the quality of software systems. Conventional validation of embedded electronic control units (ECUs) using hardware-in- the-loop (HIL) testing is performed in the late stages using the big bang integration style, resulting in delayed feedback, lack of scalability, and insufficient fault diagnosis. Furthermore, test recording analysis is performed manually based on expert knowledge to identify the nature of the failure occurring. This, in turn, resulted in higher development costs and effort, delays fault detection, and hinders agile collaboration. To address these gaps, this article proposes a novel continuous integration (CI)-enabled HIL testing framework to facilitate continuous software development through iterative cycles. Furthermore, based on a representative critical faults dataset, intelligent data-driven ML-assisted Fault Detection and Diagnosis (FDD) models are developed, including LSTM and K-means for the diagnosis of known and unknown sensor-related faults as classification and clustering problems, respectively. The novel aspect of the robust models lies in the integration of a denoising autoencoder (DAE) for the extraction of representative features before the classification and clustering process, considering the noise conditions. The evaluation outcomes illustrate the superiority of the proposed model for known faults classification in comparison to other state-of-the-art methods, with an average F1-score of 91.85%. Furthermore, the integration of DAE with k-means exhibited a high clustering performance against noise with a low mean squared error (MSE) and Davies-Bouldin index (DBI), i.e., 0.044 and 0.68, respectively. It has been demonstrated that the proposed methodology facilitates more efficient, automated, and accurate fault analysis within the framework of automotive software validation workflows. Consequently, this approach enhances both safety and efficiency in comparison to conventional methodologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.