ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025
An artificial intelligence model of whole-slide pathology specimens differentiating cutaneous high-grade squamous proliferations.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in small tissue biopsies: diagnostic applications, histochemical integration, and methodological challenges in surgical pathology.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026Review
- Vision transformer-based diagnosis of psoriasis and eczema in whole-slide histology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and verruca vulgaris (VV) are skin conditions involving the proliferation of epidermal keratinocytes requiring fundamentally different treatments. Histological evaluation of highly differentiated squamous cell proliferations can be challenging, particularly in small or superficial samples. This study aims to improve diagnostic accuracy using an AI model to distinguish cSCC from VV. We developed a deep-learning model using clustering-constrained attention multiple instance learning (CLAM) to classify hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) as cSCC or VV. The dataset comprised 289 WSIs (n = 148 cSCC, n = 141 VV). Quality control was ensured through expert review: the training cohort was evaluated by four dermatopathologists, and the evaluation cohort by six additional experts. On the training set, the model achieved an AUROC of 0.99, with an accuracy of 94.9% for cSCC and 91.2% for VV. On the evaluation set, it reached an AUROC of 0.96, and accuracies of 82.4% (cSCC) and 97.4% (VV), similar to the average performance of individual dermatopathologists. We successfully trained and implemented an interpretable deep-learning-based weakly supervised model on WSIs distinguishing cSCC from VV, which could enhance AI-supported diagnostics in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.