ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Apraxic deficits predict general cognitive impairment in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combining Linguistic, Behavioral and Visuospatial Measures to Characterize Multidomain Impairment in Dementia.Brain sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Apraxia represents a core feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD), a neurodegenerative disorder characterised by the accumulation of β-amyloid plaques and tau deposition. However, systematic descriptions of apraxic deficits in AD patients remain scarce. Here, we comprehensively investigate apraxia profiles and their link with cognitive impairment in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology. We characterised the frequency and patterns of apraxic deficits in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology using a battery of standardised apraxia tests. Demographic variables and apraxia scores were related to patients' general cognitive impairment using hierarchical regression analysis. Apraxic deficits were found in 67% of patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology (n = 63). Patients with Alzheimer's pathology were more impaired in imitating finger gestures (than hand gestures: 89.2% vs. 80.0%, p < 0.001) and imitating complex hand movements (than single hand movements: 97.4% vs. 78.5%, p < 0.001), even when controlling for general cognitive impairment. Apraxia assessments explained about 60% of the variance in dementia severity, with performance in the KAS subtest of pantomiming object use (beta coefficient: 0.47, p = 0.001) and the DATE subtest for limb apraxia (beta coefficient: 0.37, p = 0.005) constituting significant predictors of general cognitive impairment. These findings emphasise the relevance of apraxia in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology, revealing that praxis deficits predict general cognitive impairment in AD. Further research is warranted into the role of apraxia as a potential early diagnostic criterion in AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.