ArticleNature aging2025
A distinct population of CD8
Article in Nature aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Immunomodulators for Cancer Immunotherapy: Insights Into Resistance and Therapeutic Strategies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- A targeted epigenetic clock for simultaneous assessment of biological aging and cancer-associated methylation drift.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- Respiratory virus immune response in the aged host.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2026Review
- Decoding the tumor-aging axis: from bench to clinical.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Distribution and function of human long-lasting T cells in aging and non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Aging and lung diseases: Unraveling mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2025Review
- Oncolytic virus and immunogenic cell death in cancer therapy.Tumour virus research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-related increases in cancer have traditionally been attributed to compromised antitumor immunity of exhausted and dysfunctional CD8⁺ T cells. Here we provide an alternative mechanism: in aging, cancer also progresses with the help of fully functional CD8⁺ T cells. These transcriptionally and epigenetically distinct cells (termed double-positive CD8
Indexed as
Identifiers
40999030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.