ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a machine learning model for cardiovascular disease risk prediction in type 2 diabetes patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Machine Learning Integration of Clinical and Molecular Biomarkers to Predict Vascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The potential of artificial intelligence in clinical trials.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Early detection of chronic kidney disease based on a SURD-enhanced machine learning model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of an interpretable machine learning model for diagnosing coronary heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and MASLD.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Unraveling the Mechanism of Cuochuangling Pills in Rosacea Treatment: An Integrated Approach Combining Network Pharmacology, Bioinformatics, and Experimental Validation.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Enhancing clinically cardiovascular machine learning model for risk prediction via sample augmentation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- A study on the risk prediction of heart disease in diabetes patients based on machine learning.Science progressArticle
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to the general population. Accurately predicting this risk is crucial for developing personalized treatment plans and public health interventions. This study aims to develop and validate a model for predicting CVD risk in T2DM patients using the Boruta feature selection algorithm and machine learning methods. We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2018. Six machine learning (ML) models, including Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Decision Tree (DT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Logistic Regression (LR), and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), were employed for model development and validation. Boruta was used for optimal feature selection. The performance of the machine learning models was comprehensively evaluated using ROC curves, accuracy, and other related metrics. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) analysis was conducted for visual interpretation, and the Shinyapps.io platform was utilized to deploy the best-performing models as web-based applications. A total of 4,015 T2DM patients were included, among which 999 (24.9%) had CVD. Model evaluation revealed significant overfitting with the KNN algorithm, which showed perfect discrimination in the training set but performed poorly in the test set (AUC = 0.64). In contrast, XGBoost demonstrated more consistent performance between training and testing datasets (AUC = 0.75 and 0.72, respectively), indicating better generalization ability and making it more suitable for clinical application. Using SHAP analysis, the top 10 important influencing factors identified by the XGBoost model were utilized to construct a CVD risk prediction platform for T2DM patients. The prediction model based on Boruta feature selection and machine learning shows promising results in assessing the CVD risk among T2DM patients. This study provides a viable tool for clinical use, facilitating early intervention and precision treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.