Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40999026›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and validation of a machine learning model for cardiovascular disease risk prediction in type 2 diabetes patients.

Chunming Xu, Fachao Shi, Wenlong Ding, Cunming Fang, Caoyang Fang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The potential of artificial intelligence in clinical trials.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chunming Xu *Department of Cardiology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China.
Fachao Shi *Department of Cardiology, Maanshan People's Hospital, Maanshan, 243000, Anhui, China.
Wenlong DingDepartment of Cardiology, Xuancheng Hospital Affiliated to Wannan Medical College, Xuancheng People 's Hospital, Xuancheng Anhui, 242000, China.
Cunming FangDepartment of Cardiology, Xuancheng Hospital Affiliated to Wannan Medical College, Xuancheng People 's Hospital, Xuancheng Anhui, 242000, China.
Caoyang FangDepartment of Emergency, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230000, Anhui, China. fcyahslyy@ustc.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to the general population. Accurately predicting this risk is crucial for developing personalized treatment plans and public health interventions. This study aims to develop and validate a model for predicting CVD risk in T2DM patients using the Boruta feature selection algorithm and machine learning methods. We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2018. Six machine learning (ML) models, including Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Decision Tree (DT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Logistic Regression (LR), and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), were employed for model development and validation. Boruta was used for optimal feature selection. The performance of the machine learning models was comprehensively evaluated using ROC curves, accuracy, and other related metrics. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) analysis was conducted for visual interpretation, and the Shinyapps.io platform was utilized to deploy the best-performing models as web-based applications. A total of 4,015 T2DM patients were included, among which 999 (24.9%) had CVD. Model evaluation revealed significant overfitting with the KNN algorithm, which showed perfect discrimination in the training set but performed poorly in the test set (AUC = 0.64). In contrast, XGBoost demonstrated more consistent performance between training and testing datasets (AUC = 0.75 and 0.72, respectively), indicating better generalization ability and making it more suitable for clinical application. Using SHAP analysis, the top 10 important influencing factors identified by the XGBoost model were utilized to construct a CVD risk prediction platform for T2DM patients. The prediction model based on Boruta feature selection and machine learning shows promising results in assessing the CVD risk among T2DM patients. This study provides a viable tool for clinical use, facilitating early intervention and precision treatment.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Machine LearningAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveBoruta feature selectionCardiovascular diseaseCVDMachine learningT2DMType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID40999026
PMCPMC12464162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.