Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40999016›Full record

ArticleCommunications chemistry2025

A comparative study of machine learning models on molecular fingerprints for odor decoding.

Jinyoung Suh, Yeonju Hong, Chunho Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. PharmaGNN: a model for odor prediction based on graph neural networks.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jinyoung SuhR&I Center, COSMAX Inc., Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. jyseo@cosmax.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1313-1712
Yeonju HongR&I Center, COSMAX Inc., Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5066-8353
Chunho ParkR&I Center, COSMAX Inc., Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how molecular structure relates to odor perception is a longstanding problem, with important implications for fragrance development and sensory science. In this study, we present an advanced comparative analysis of machine learning approaches for predicting fragrance odors, examining both individual descriptor-based models and integrated frameworks. Using a curated dataset of 8681 compounds from ten expert sources, we benchmark functional group fingerprints, classical molecular descriptors, and Morgan structural fingerprints across Random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine. The Morgan-fingerprint-based XGBoost model achieves the highest discrimination (AUROC 0.828, AUPRC 0.237), outperforming descriptor-based models. Our findings highlight the superior representational capacity of molecular fingerprints to capture olfactory cues, not only achieving high predictive performance but also revealing a continuous, interpretable scent space that aligns with perceptual and chemical relationships. This paves the way for data-driven research into olfactory mechanisms, alongside the next generation of in silico odor prediction.

Identifiers

PMID40999016
PMCPMC12462479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.