ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficient biomass valorization using silica supported imidazolium based ionic liquid catalysts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Magnetic lignin-supported sulfonic acid ionic liquid: a novel catalyst for synthesis of 2-amino-4-aryl-4RSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficient valorization of lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) into high-value platform chemicals such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) and furfural offers a sustainable alternative to fossil-based resources. In this study, we report the design and application of efficiently recyclable, silica-supported imidazolium-based acidic ionic liquid (IL) heterogeneous catalysts for the conversion of real, extracted cellulose and hemicellulose derived from wheat straw, rice husk and bagasse. The synthesized catalysts were extensively characterized using FTIR, XRD, TGA, BET and their Brønsted acidity was quantified. Catalytic activity was optimized by evaluating key reaction parameters, including catalyst loading, time, and temperature. Under mild operational conditions (80 °C for cellulose and 120 °C for hemicellulose), high yields of 5-HMF (91%) and furfural (86%) were achieved. The catalysts also demonstrated excellent recyclability over five consecutive reaction cycles without significant loss in activity. This study offers a scalable and environmentally benign approach for biomass valorization, highlighting the potential for industrial implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.