Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40998939›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Assessing wildfire extents in Siberian forests using machine learning.

Ivan P Malashin, Igor Masich, Vladimir Nelyub, Aleksei Borodulin, Andrei Gantimurov, Vadim Tynchenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ivan P MalashinBauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005, Moscow, Russia. ivan.p.malashin@gmail.com.
Igor MasichBauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005, Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir NelyubBauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005, Moscow, Russia.
Aleksei BorodulinBauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005, Moscow, Russia.
Andrei GantimurovBauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005, Moscow, Russia.
Vadim TynchenkoBauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildfires significantly impact ecosystem dynamics and forest management strategies globally, including in Siberian forests. This study develops a machine learning (ML) framework to estimate wildfire size by integrating meteorological variables, forest composition, detection techniques, and historical fire records within the Krasnoyarsk Krai region of central Siberia. The dataset includes temperature, humidity, wind speed, precipitation, geospatial coordinates, and proximity to human settlements, which are used to train multiple predictive models, including XGBoost, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, Logistic Regression, and Decision Tree. XGBoost achieved the highest classification accuracy of 88.8%, outperforming other methods. Feature importance analysis highlights the influence of urban proximity, wind patterns, and meteorological conditions related to fuel moisture on fire size prediction. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis indicates that smaller fires are associated with localized weather conditions, while extended dry periods correspond to larger fire events. While these results demonstrate the potential of ML for fire size classification in this specific region, the framework should be considered exploratory and region-specific. Future applications to other areas will require local data calibration.

Indexed as

Climate factorsFire size estimationMachine learningSiberian forestsWildfire prediction

Identifiers

PMID40998939
PMCPMC12464253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.