ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessing wildfire extents in Siberian forests using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-fidelity CNN-based surrogate modeling for wildfire spread forecasting.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wildfires significantly impact ecosystem dynamics and forest management strategies globally, including in Siberian forests. This study develops a machine learning (ML) framework to estimate wildfire size by integrating meteorological variables, forest composition, detection techniques, and historical fire records within the Krasnoyarsk Krai region of central Siberia. The dataset includes temperature, humidity, wind speed, precipitation, geospatial coordinates, and proximity to human settlements, which are used to train multiple predictive models, including XGBoost, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, Logistic Regression, and Decision Tree. XGBoost achieved the highest classification accuracy of 88.8%, outperforming other methods. Feature importance analysis highlights the influence of urban proximity, wind patterns, and meteorological conditions related to fuel moisture on fire size prediction. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis indicates that smaller fires are associated with localized weather conditions, while extended dry periods correspond to larger fire events. While these results demonstrate the potential of ML for fire size classification in this specific region, the framework should be considered exploratory and region-specific. Future applications to other areas will require local data calibration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.