ArticleScientific reports2025
Non-invasive detection of choroidal melanoma via tear-derived protein corona on gold nanoparticles: a machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Advancing nanomedicine with machine learning: predicting protein corona and nano-bio interactions.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the feasibility of using tear sample analysis, based on protein corona formation on gold nanoparticles combined with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and machine learning techniques, as a non-invasive approach for the detection of choroidal melanoma. The aim is to assess whether protein-nanoparticle interactions can support early and reliable identification of this ocular condition. Tear samples were collected using Schirmer strips from six healthy individuals and six patients diagnosed with choroidal melanoma, with subsequent augmentation to 18 samples per group. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs, ~ 20 nm) were synthesized via citrate reduction and incubated with tear samples to form protein coronas, which were analyzed using ESI-MS. Eight statistical and entropy-based features (mean, variance, skewness, kurtosis, Shannon entropy, approximate entropy, sample entropy, and permutation entropy) were extracted from spectral data. Additionally, Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) with Mexican hat wavelet was applied to convert mass spectrometry data into 128 × 128 RGB images for deep learning analysis. Classification was performed using traditional machine learning models (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Deep Neural Network) and transfer learning with pre-trained CNNs (VGG16, ResNet50, Xception), evaluated through 5-fold cross-validation. Significant differences in spectral intensity parameters were observed between healthy individuals and choroidal melanoma patients (p < 0.001), with notably lower Mean_Intensity values in cancer patients (56.41 ± 46.06 vs. 111.02 ± 10.01, Cohen's d = 1.64). While m/z parameters showed moderate differences that didn't reach statistical significance (p = 0.082), entropy-based features demonstrated strong discriminative power. Among traditional machine learning models, Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy (0.959 ± 0.003) and ROC AUC (0.993 ± 0.000) with remarkable computational efficiency (3.90 s per fold). For deep learning approaches using CWT-generated images, VGG16 demonstrated superior performance (Accuracy: 0.976 ± 0.008, ROC AUC: 0.997 ± 0.002) despite requiring significantly higher computational resources (1349.52 s per fold). This study demonstrates that tear sample analysis using protein corona formation on gold nanoparticles with ESI-MS and advanced machine learning techniques offers a promising non-invasive approach for choroidal melanoma detection with performance metrics that compare favorably to existing methods. The significant differences in spectral intensity parameters between groups suggest distinctive proteomic signatures that can be leveraged for diagnostic purposes. While both traditional machine learning and deep learning approaches achieved exceptional performance, each offers distinct advantages in terms of computational efficiency and feature extraction capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.