ArticleScientific reports2025
The influence of complex classroom noise on auditory selective attention.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent efforts to mimic real-life situations in experiments aim to improve the ecological validity of research. Acoustically, this often involves using binaural reproduction to create realistic environments. While studies have shown that simplified acoustic presentations, such as white noise, affect children's auditory selective attention without impacting adults, other research suggests that these effects might be overestimated in monaural scenarios. This underscores the need for more realistic approaches. The current study introduced spatialized, non-stationary classroom noise with and without speech, comparing it to white noise and a silent baseline in a child-appropriate experiment on auditory selective attention in a virtual reality classroom. Findings from adult participants, who were tested to validate the paradigm, indicated significantly higher error rates for realistic classroom noise compared to white noise and silence. Trials with intelligible speech as a distractor were particularly disruptive to auditory attention. Participants also reported higher mental demand, perceived effort, and task difficulty with complex noise types. These results emphasize the importance of using complex noise scenarios in auditory cognition research to draw conclusions applicable to real-life situations. This approach provides a more accurate understanding of how realistic classroom noise affects auditory selective attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.