ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparing infant pain and stress during retinopathy of prematurity screening using ophthalmoscopy and non-contact imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preterm Infant Stress During Noncontact Handheld Optical Coherence Tomography and Contact Fundus Photography.JAMA ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current standard of care for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening eye examinations, binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO), is associated with discomfort and stress in infants. In this study, we compared pain scores and vital signs during examination with BIO and non-contact laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI). Preterm neonates underwent retinal exam with BIO and LSCI during ROP screening. Infant stress was scored using the Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS), and collected with vital signs, before, during, and after eye examination. Seventy-one infants with gestational ages 22-32 weeks and birthweights 400-1900 g underwent 196 BIO examinations and 101 LSCI examinations. N-PASS scores during BIO were significantly higher than LSCI (8.8 vs. 3.7, p < 0.0001). Maximum heart rate was significantly higher during BIO compared to LSCI (182 ± 19 beats per minute vs. 175 ± 20 beats per minute, p = 0.008). Minimum oxygen saturation was significantly lower during BIO compared to LSCI (83 ± 12% vs. 86 ± 10%, p = 0.035). After BIO, vital sign instability remained for 30 s, whereas vital signs returned to baseline after LSCI. We found lower pain scores and more stable vital signs during LSCI compared to BIO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.