ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of emotional migration on Cooperation for public goods games on continuous two-dimensional space.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotion helps people hide from traitors and follow partners. It greatly affects the actual migration in a public goods game (PGG). How this factor affect the migration and the corresponding cooperation level has still not been investigated yet. An emotional migration in a PGG on continuous two-dimensional space was investigated. An emotional index was proposed to describe the different attitude of a player to his different neighbors. An emotional migration model was proposed by defining a weight function that a cooperator goes with a neighbor who makes him happier and gets away from a neighbor who makes him angry. Results show that the emotional migration mechanism acts as a double-edged sword, with its effects intricately intertwined with migratory velocity and interaction radius. When both migratory velocity and interaction radius are low, stable emotional communication gradually solidifies the foundation of trust. This process motivates individuals to actively engage in public goods provision, fostering a virtuous cycle of win-win cooperation. Conversely, when migratory velocity surges and the interaction scope expands exponentially, excessive emotional migration disrupts the trust equilibrium, undermines resource allocation order, and renders cooperative strategies unsustainable. Ultimately, this leads to the collapse of the entire cooperative system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.