Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40998885›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Fidelity assessment of synthetic images with multi-criteria combination under adverse weather conditions.

Alexandra Duminil, Sio-Song Ieng, Dominique Gruyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandra DuminilGustave Eiffel University, COSYS/PICS-L, 77454, Marne-la-Vallée, France.
Sio-Song IengGustave Eiffel University, COSYS/PICS-L, 77454, Marne-la-Vallée, France. sio-song.ieng@univ-eiffel.fr.
Dominique GruyerGustave Eiffel University, COSYS/PICS-L, 77454, Marne-la-Vallée, France.

Funding

PRISSMA project DOS0147739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of AI-based perception algorithms using cameras, access to large and representative datasets is crucial. For autonomous driving systems, it is essential to use road context datasets covering the entire Operating Design Domain, including various road configurations, driving scenarios, and weather conditions. In this context, it is imperative to propose mechanisms and metrics that allow quantifying the fidelity and the level of representativeness of these simulated datasets, in order to evaluate and validate their usability for training and evaluation stages. In this paper, we propose an objective and multi-modal approach allowing to calculate 4 scores representing several aspects of the synthetic image fidelity. These scores address local, global and statistical texture analysis. In addition, a multi-criteria approach, based on evidence theory, is proposed to merge these scores to obtain a final global score. The result is the generation of a global score along with the uncertainty and conflict quantification. This method has been applied on a large number of real and virtual datasets in different weather conditions (clear, rainy, foggy). The initial results are promising and confirm the interest and the relevance of this method.

Indexed as

Image analysisMulti-criteria combinationSynthetic image fidelity

Identifiers

PMID40998885
PMCPMC12464247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.