ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing the radiation dose in a murine model of breast implant capsular fibrosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast implant capsular contracture (CC) is the leading complication following reconstructive breast surgery, especially in breast cancer patients who undergo radiotherapy after reconstruction surgery. The exact pathophysiology of this complication is unclear with limited treatment options and high-quality research models are greatly needed. Here, we aimed to determine the optimal protocol to create an easily reproducible murine model that recapitulates the effects of radiotherapy following breast implantation. We implanted smooth mini silicone breast implants into a dorsal subcutaneous pocket of 8-week-old, female C57Bl/6 mice. Then, we immediately applied a directed dose of 10-Gy (N = 11), and 15-Gy (N = 11) slit-beam radiation to the implanted area along with non-irradiated mice (N = 11). The follow-up period was 42 -days post-radiation after which histological and tissue gene expression studies were done. Circulating TGF-b concentrations were also measured. Radiation therapy led to a significant decrease in total body weight and was proportional to the radiation dose. The 10-Gy dose of targeted radiotherapy significantly increased mean capsular thickness measured at 42 days following the procedure. However, mice who received a 15-Gy dose did not present with increased mean capsular thickness compared with implant-only mice. The 10-Gy dose upregulated pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory genes such as Collagen-3 and TIMP1 while the 15-Gy dose did not. Targeted radiotherapy with a 10-Gy and not 15-Gy dose in implanted mice induced significant CC along with an elevated pro-fibrotic response. Our findings demonstrate the successful development of a robust mouse model of breast implant CC using a 10-Gy unfractionated dose of radiotherapy immediately after implant insertion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.