ArticleScientific reports2025
Life cycle assessment of high value activated carbon production based on mass and functional performance metrics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbon footprint of biomass-derived activated carbon: life cycle assessment, environmental sustainability, and carbon-negative potential.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Cradle-to-Gate Life-Cycle Assessment of a Waste Printed Circuit Board-Derived Adsorbent: Production Impacts Normalized by Heavy-Metal Adsorption Capacity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Engineered bacterial siderophore production accelerates rock weathering for carbon removal.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The production of activated carbon (AC) from biomass holds substantial environmental potential, but its impact varies widely depending on the synthesis methods employed. However, unreliable experimental data results in inconsistent life cycle assessments (LCA), often dependent on generic or highly localized information. Most available data focuses solely on production metrics, neglecting crucial performance-based indicators. This study conducts LCA for a conceptual AC production facility designed to produce 1 kg of AC per batch of coconut shell (CS), particularly examining potassium hydroxide (KOH) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) activation routes. Environmental impacts (EIs) are evaluated using two functional units-mass-based and adsorption-based-and span eighteen metrics, including six key ones: net energy, climate change (CC), ozone depletion, fine particulate matter formation, marine eutrophication, and metal depletion. CC (kg CO₂ eq.) for 1 kg of AC production is 1.255 for KOH and 1.209 for NaOH, while energy requirements (in MJ) are 28.314 for KOH and 27.063 for NaOH. Notably, the pyrolysis step emerges as the most energy-intensive and significant contributor to carbon emissions. Per the adsorption-based unit, the KOH-led pathway shows a higher adsorption capacity of 729 g/kg versus 662 g/kg for NaOH, requiring less AC per kg of dye adsorbed. Consequently, the KOH pathway achieves 5% greater energy efficiency and 6% lower carbon emissions than the NaOH pathway. Synthesized ACs outperform commercial AC in all metrics, especially in energy use and carbon emissions. The study proposes improvements, such as alternative drying methods, to mitigate EIs and emphasizes the need to consider both production efficiency and functional performance to guide sustainable AC production and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.