ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing IoV cloud trust with adaptive blockchain and reinforcement learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Secure and intelligent SDN-IoV framework with blockchain-based authentication and optimization-based QoS routing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- TimesNet-BFT: Mitigating Network State Uncertainty in Byzantine Consensus via Deep Temporal Modeling.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advent of the Internet of Vehicles (IoV), vehicles produce an unprecedented data flow, inspiring innovative data-sharing strategies within the IoV ecosystem. To enhance security, efficacy, and driving experiences, the IoV facilitates real-time information interchange across vehicles, infrastructure, and cloud platforms, thereby transforming transportation. However, there are several concerns with the present IoV, including privacy breaches, security holes, and the possibility of malevolent vehicles uploading false information to the network, which might cause significant traffic jams. Thus, researchers have been focusing on trust management for vehicular networks. The advent of blockchain technology has addressed this concern by making IoV trust management data secure. Unfortunately, blockchain's speed and scalability issues render it unfit for networks operating on a massive scale. To overcome these issues, the article presents Blockchain-MLTrustNet, a novel trust management system, to enhance secure and scalable vehicle-to-everything(V2X) communication in IoV networks hosted on cloud platforms. It combines adaptive graph-sharding blockchain with deep reinforcement learning to create a strong framework for trust management score and transaction validation, and it also comes with a privacy protection scheme to address user privacy concerns. The Adaptive Graph Sharding Blockchain (AGSB) divides the network into adaptable shards that manage a subset of vehicles and transactions. This speeds up transaction processing, reduces latency, and supports more devices. Deep Reinforcement Learning evaluates infrastructure and car reliability concurrently. Comparing Blockchain-MLTrustNet to state-of-the-art approaches (e.g., WGAN-SMOTE, MESMERIC), extensive trials on the VeReMi dataset show that it increases trust score accuracy by 15% and decreases transaction latency by 37%. With its unified design, the system satisfies the specific requirements of the IoV in terms of scalability, security, and privacy, making it suitable for implementation in the real world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.