ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated segmentation of brain metastases in magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning in radiotherapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cervi-LLM for real time colposcopy lesion detection and interpretable diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial tumors and stereotactic radiotherapy improved the life quality of patient with BMs, while it requires more time and experience to delineate BMs precisely by oncologists. Deep Learning techniques showed promising applications in radiation oncology. Therefore, we proposed a deep learning-based automatic segmentation of primary tumor volumes for BMs in this work. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 158 eligible patients with BMs was retrospectively collected in the study. An automatic segmentation model called BUC-Net based on U-Net with cascade strategy and bottleneck module was proposed for auto-segmentation of BMs. The proposed model was evaluated using geometric metrics (Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) and Average surface distance (ASD)) for the performance of automatic segmentation, and Precision recall (PR) and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the performance of automatic detection, and relative volume difference (RVD) for evaluation. Compared with U-Net and U-Net Cascade, the BUC-Net achieved the average DSC of 0.912 and 0.797, HD95 of 0.901 mm and 0.922 mm, ASD of 0.332 mm and 0.210 mm for the evaluation of automatic segmentation in binary classification and multiple classification, respectively. The average Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.934 and 0.835 for (Precision-Recall) PR and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for the tumor detection. It also performed the minimum RVD with various diameter ranges in the clinical evaluation. The BUC-Net can achieve the segmentation and modification of BMs for one patient within 10 min, instead of 3-6 h by the conventional manual modification, which is conspicuous to improve the efficiency and accuracy of radiation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.