ArticleScientific reports2025
Attention-Enhanced CNNs and transformers for accurate monkeypox and skin disease detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of attention mechanisms in choral conducting education using EEG and eye movement tracking with transfer learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and clinical validation of an artificial intelligence based model for thyroid nodule malignancy risk assessment using C-TIRADS guidelines.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Severe viral rash progression prediction and surveillance early warning based on local-global attention and temporal convolutional network.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Adult-type diffuse glioma prediction using MnasNet optimized by the advanced single candidate optimizer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Assessing agreement with a single-center expert consensus: artificial intelligence-assisted teleultrasound for thyroid nodules categorized as C-TIRADS 4A or higher.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monkeypox has arisen as a global health issue, requiring prompt and precise diagnosis for optimal management. Conventional diagnostic techniques, including PCR, are dependable yet frequently unattainable in resource-constrained environments. Deep learning demonstrates potential in automating disease detection from skin lesion images; nevertheless, current models are hindered by limits in feature extraction and misclassification challenges. This paper presents an attention-augmented deep learning architecture to enhance classification accuracy for monkeypox and other dermatological conditions. This work presents a model based on EfficientNetB7, augmented with coordinate attention to enhance feature extraction and classification accuracy. The Monkeypox Skin Lesion Dataset (MSLD v2.0) is utilised, incorporating pre-processing methods such as image normalisation, scaling, and data augmentation. Diverse edge detection techniques are examined to enhance feature representation. The model is subjected to five-fold cross-validation and is evaluated against Xception, Swin Transformer, ResNet-50, MobileNetV2, and baseline EfficientNet models, utilising accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC as assessment measures. Our model attains an unparalleled accuracy of 99.99%, precision of 99.8%, recall of 99.9%, F1-score of 99.85%, and an AUC of 100%. In contrast to previous studies that indicated a maximum accuracy of 98.81%, our methodology markedly diminishes false negatives and improves generalisation. This research sets a novel standard for AI-based monkeypox detection, showcasing exceptional accuracy and resilience. The results endorse the incorporation of AI-driven diagnostic tools in clinical and telemedicine settings, with prospects for immediate implementation and extensive epidemiological monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.