Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40998848›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Bird mortality on high-speed railways: lessons from two large contrasting species.

Cristina Mata, Juan E Malo, Eladio L García de la Morena, Israel Hervás, Ana E Santamaría, Jesús Herranz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristina Mata *Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049, Madrid, Spain. cristina.mata@uam.es.
Juan E Malo *Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049, Madrid, Spain. je.malo@uam.es.
Eladio L García de la MorenaTerrestrial Ecology Group, Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Israel HervásTerrestrial Ecology Group, Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Ana E SantamaríaTerrestrial Ecology Group, Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús HerranzCentro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Comunidad de Madrid, REMEDINAL TE-CM research network P2018/EMT-4338EU LIFE+ Impacto Cero project LIFE 12 BIO/ES/000660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collisions are the chief effect of transport infrastructures on vertebrate populations, but their relevance in high-speed railways (HSR) is largely unknown. We analyzed Great Bustard (Otis tarda) and Eurasian Eagle-owl (Bubo bubo) mortality along two 5-km stretches of a Spanish HSR. Five fresh bustards and 10 owl carcasses were collected during 40 weeks of monitoring over two years, plus older remains of 14 bustards and 17 owls more. Relevant mortalities of both bird species thus occur, and according to complementary results differences in local use of the infrastructure explain their spatial patterns. Bustards die at points where they fly across optimizing their local movements, while owls probably die while hunting the abundant rabbits present on railway verges. The case alerts about potential bird mortality due to HSR and exemplifies how impact prediction, evaluation, and mitigation must accommodate species' characteristics to be successful.

Indexed as

BirdsRailroadsStrigiformesAnimalsMortalitySpain

Identifiers

PMID40998848
PMCPMC12462518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.