ArticleNature communications2025
Development of clinical immunity to Plasmodium vivax following repeat controlled human malaria infection.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03797989 (VAC069), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
VAC069: A Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Feasibility of Controlled Blood-stage Plasmodium Vivax Human Malaria Infection Through Experimental Inoculation of Cryopreserved Infected Erythrocytes in Healthy Malaria-naïve UK Adults
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Malaria serology for surveillance, insights into immunity, and vaccine development.Infection and immunity · 2026Review
- Frequent and genetically diverseResearch square · 2026Article
- A longitudinal study of children identifies antibody Fc-mediated functions and antigen targets of immunity to Plasmodium vivax malaria.Immunity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical immunity to malaria can lead to asymptomatic infection, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. To examine the development of clinical immunity, we conducted a multi-cohort, repeat controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) study with Plasmodium vivax, and a heterologous rechallenge with P. falciparum (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03797989). Malaria-naïve adults underwent CHMI up to three times, by administration of red blood cells infected with P. vivax PvW1 clone or P. falciparum 3D7 clone. Nineteen participants underwent primary CHMI with P. vivax, 12 returned for secondary homologous CHMI and 2 for tertiary homologous CHMI. Six participants who had completed P. vivax CHMI then underwent heterologous rechallenge with P. falciparum. We find that clinical immunity to P. vivax develops rapidly after a single CHMI, protecting participants against fever and laboratory abnormalities. This is underpinned by the attenuation of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, as well as reduced coagulation and endothelium activation. In contrast, there is no evidence of anti-parasite immunity, suggesting that mechanisms of clinical immunity can operate independently of pathogen load to reduce the damage caused by malaria infection. In addition, we show that clinical immunity to P. vivax is parasite species-specific and provides no protection against CHMI with P. falciparum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.