ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025
Statistical Physics-Based Approaches to Model the Function and Complexation of Disordered Proteins.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Charge Interactions in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional classification of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDP) is a challenge due to their low sequence homology and lack of stable tertiary structure. We embrace this challenge to classify a model system of two IDPs─NCBD and CID─that have coevolved and for which both ancestral and extant sequences are available, along with quantitative binding data. One of these sequences, NCBD, exhibits partial secondary structure, while the other (CID) remains highly disordered and is highly charged. We classify these sequences using statistical physics-derived sequence-dependent interaction maps that predict distance maps (ensemble average distances between arbitrary residue pairs). We also use sequence-specific dynamic profiles for further comparison. Our findings show that CID proteins can be classified into two major groups due to two distinct types of patterns in their electrostatic interaction maps. Classification of CIDs using nonelectrostatic patterning yields diverging predictions, illustrating the importance of accurately modeling long-range electrostatic interactions. Conversely, the classification of NCBD sequences generally reaches a consensus when physics-based noncharge patterning metrics are applied, along with the dynamical profiles. Furthermore, we used these sequence-dependent metrics and dynamical profiles to quantitatively model the binding affinities between the two IDPs. Surprisingly, we find that multiple physics-based sequence metrics quantitatively recapitulate the binding affinities between CID and NCBD variants, linking sequence composition and patterning to their emergent function. This integrated framework provides a generalizable strategy for classifying IDPs and predicting complexation behavior, offering new avenues for probing sequence-function relationships in disordered protein systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.