Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40998747›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2025

All-Oral Shorter Treatment Regimens for Multidrug- and Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis: Evaluating Their Effectiveness, Safety, and Impact on the Quality of Life of Patients in Lao PDR.

Vibol Iem, Sakhone Suthepmany, Vongkham Inthavong, Anousone Sisouvanh, Khamloun Choumlivong, Kyung Hyun Oh, Philipp du Cros, Fatimata Bintou Sall, Corinne S Merle, Jacques Sebert and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vibol IemCentre for Tuberculosis Research, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Sakhone SuthepmanyNational Tuberculosis Control Center, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Vongkham InthavongNational Tuberculosis Control Center, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Anousone SisouvanhNational Tuberculosis Control Center, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Khamloun ChoumlivongSethathirath Hospital, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Kyung Hyun OhWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines.
Philipp du CrosBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Fatimata Bintou SallSpecial Programme of Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Corinne S MerleSpecial Programme of Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jacques SebertOffice of the WHO Representative in Lao PDR, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Donekham InthavongNational Tuberculosis Control Center, Vientiane, Lao PDR.

Funding

Ministry of HealthWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug-resistant tuberculosis remains a major public health challenge in Lao PDR, with low second-line treatment uptake and suboptimal outcomes. To improve effectiveness, safety, and tolerability, a shorter all-oral regimen for multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) was introduced under the TDR Short, all-Oral Regimens for Rifampicin-resistant Tuberculosis (ShORRT) initiative.

methodsA retrospective and prospective comparative cohort study was conducted across five drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment centres from January 2020 to December 2023. Two programmatic cohorts were analysed during partially overlapping calendar periods: a standard injectable-containing regimen cohort and an all-oral regimen cohort. Outcomes were assessed at the end of treatment and 12 months post-treatment. Safety was evaluated through adverse events, including serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest. Health-related quality of life was measured using EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS tools.

resultsAmong 126 participants, 65 received the all-oral regimen and 61 the standard regimen. Treatment success was higher in the all-oral group (90.8% vs. 80.3%), with lower mortality (7.5% vs. 16.4%) and fewer serious adverse events (12.3% vs. 19.7%). Anaemia was more common in the all-oral group (46.2%), while hepatotoxicity and QTcF prolongation were more frequent in the standard group. Both groups showed improvements in health-related quality of life, but greater recovery in mobility, daily activities, and anxiety reduction was observed in the all-oral group. Between group differences did not reach statistical significance. No cases of tuberculosis recurrence were reported at 12-month follow-up in either group.

conclusionIn this programmatic setting, the all-oral, bedaquiline and linezolid-based regimen demonstrated high effectiveness and acceptable safety. Non-significant trends favoured the all-oral regimen for treatment success, mortality, and quality of life, consistent with but not definitive for improved outcomes. These findings support the transition to all-oral regimens as the preferred approach for drug-resistant tuberculosis care, while acknowledging the observational design and limited power.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsQuality of LifeRifampinTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAdministration, OralAdultFemaleHumansLaosMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntitubercular AgentsRifampinall‐oral regimendrug‐resistant tuberculosishealth‐related quality of lifeprogrammatic implementationrifampicin‐resistant TBtreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40998747
PMCPMC12675319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.