ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Barriers and facilitators perceived by professionals while implementing Soothing and Sleeping in Dutch Healthcare: a mixed-methods study.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany parents struggle with infant crying and sleep, yet some needs remain unmet by current professional support. Soothing and Sleeping, an evidence-based practice (EBP) based on the Happiest Baby method, offers preventive support and parental education for these issues. The Dutch Youth Health Care (YHC) system, monitoring 95% of children, is well-positioned to implement it.
methodThis study explores YHC professionals' perceptions of EBPs and Soothing and Sleeping and identifies key implementation barriers and facilitators. YHC professionals (n=41) completed questionnaires and participated in focus groups. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data through thematic analysis guided by the Dynamic Adaptation Process framework.
resultsProfessionals expressed positive attitudes towards EBPs and Soothing and Sleeping, with 81% adopting the method. Barriers and facilitators emerged at system, organisation, provider and client levels. Preimplementation, barriers spanned all levels, while postimplementation barriers were primarily systemic and organisational. Key barriers included resource limitations, inadequate training, organisational shifts and insufficient managerial support. Soothing and Sleeping-specific facilitators included its practicality, suitability and effectiveness.
conclusionsFindings suggest Soothing and Sleeping strengthens YHC support for infant crying and sleep. Recommendations include proactive parental outreach, appointing an implementation facilitator, ongoing training and tailored approaches for families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.