Trial reportBMJ global health2025
Safety and efficacy of the ShangRing for early infant male circumcision in the routine clinical setting.
Trial report in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03338699 (Evaluation of the ShangRing vs. Mogen Clamp for Early Infant Male Circumcision), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the ShangRing vs. Mogen Clamp for Early Infant Male Circumcision (EIMC) in Sub-Saharan Africa
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMale circumcision (MC) has been shown to decrease transmission of HIV and is a critical strategy to decrease its incidence in countries with high rates of heterosexually transmitted HIV. Early infant MC (EIMC), with single-use MC devices, could increase rates of MC in Sub-Saharan Africa. Our objective was to determine the safety, efficacy and satisfaction of ShangRing EIMC in resource-constrained environments.
methodsHealthy male infants aged 1-60 days underwent ShangRing EIMC performed by non-physician clinicians in 14 sites in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. The primary outcomes were the safety and efficacy of ShangRing EIMC. Secondary outcomes were pain related to the procedure, wound healing and parental satisfaction. Male infants were assessed at discharge and on postoperative days 7 and 28 for wound healing and complications. This trial is registered with Clinical. TRIALS: gov, NCT03338699, and is complete.
resultsFrom the 1697 participants enrolled from February to November 2020, 1691 (99.6%) underwent ShangRing EIMC. Median duration of the procedure was 10 min (IQR 6-13). The mean Neonatal Infant Pain Scale 20 min postprocedure was 0.3 (SD 0.8), indicating no pain. At the time of discharge, 1679 (99.0%) participants had a normal-appearing wound and 1574 (93.1%) demonstrated complete wound healing at 28 days. A total of 17 (1.0%) AEs were reported, most related to bleeding. A total of 1635 (99.1%) of parents were satisfied with the appearance of the circumcised penis at 28 days.
conclusionShangRing EIMC is a simple and successful MC method that non-physician clinicians can perform safely, with low AE rate, satisfactory wound healing and high satisfaction rate among parents. This indicates that the ShangRing EIMC can be considered a long-term strategic approach to accelerate the scale-up of MC in Sub-Saharan Africa. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03338699.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.