ReviewBMJ open gastroenterology2025
Endoscopic ultrasound for pancreatic cystic lesions: a narrative review.
Review in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pancreatic cystic lesions revisited: morphologic patterns and diagnostic pitfalls in daily practice.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Versus Aspiration for Pancreatic Serous Cystic Neoplasms: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The Triage Role of Transabdominal Ultrasonography (TAUS) in the Diagnostic Management of Pancreatic and Distal Biliary Pathologies: A Comparative Efficacy Analysis with Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessment of Intra-Individual Variability and Reproducibility in Pancreatic EUS-Guided Elastography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of incidental pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) has risen in recent years, largely due to advances in and increased use of imaging techniques. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become a crucial tool for evaluating and characterising PCLs, allowing for detailed morphological assessment and aiding in the identification of lesions with a higher risk of progression to high-grade dysplasia or invasive pancreatic carcinoma. This review aims to outline the key aspects of EUS in the evaluation of PCLs, covering a range of modalities from morphological assessment and contrast-enhanced imaging to elastography, fine-needle aspiration for biomarker analysis, cytology, DNA sequencing, histological evaluation and the emerging role of confocal laser endomicroscopy or artificial intelligence. Additionally, we address therapeutic EUS modalities for PCLs, the current limitations of EUS, anticipated technological advancements and the diverse management strategies recommended by leading scientific societies for the clinical handling of PCLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.