Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40998463›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open respiratory research2025

Differences in disease characteristics and outcomes as determined by biological sex in a large UK idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis population: analysis from the British Thoracic Society, Interstitial Lung Disease registry data.

Sarah Mulholland, Giles Dixon, Matthew Wells, Sam Harding, Paul White, Anne-Marie Russell, Shaney L Barratt

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah MulhollandBristol Interstitial Lung Disease Service, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK sarah.mulholland@nbt.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3758-4164
Giles DixonAcademic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9787-0739
Matthew WellsBristol Interstitial Lung Disease Service, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Sam HardingResearch and Innovation, NHS North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5870-2094
Paul WhiteMathematics and Statistics Research Group, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Anne-Marie RussellSchool of Medicine and Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences (MDS) University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0468-3537
Shaney L BarrattBristol Interstitial Lung Disease Service, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3067-7349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGrowing evidence suggests that biological sex influences the incidence, presentation, diagnosis and outcomes of many lung diseases. Understanding these differences is the first step towards precision medicine to improve patient care.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients enrolled in a national (UK), multicentre registry were categorised by sex and analysed for differences in demographics, pulmonary function tests, high resolution CT radiological pattern, eligibility/uptake of antifibrotics and survival.

resultsOf 7177 cases, 77.8% (n=5587) were male, median age 75 years (IQR 69.5-80.5) for both sexes (p=0.83). Males were more likely to have a history of smoking (males 72.9% vs females 60.5%, p<0.001) and lower baseline median forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted (males 76.4%, IQR 66.2-86.7 vs females 78.8%, IQR 68.6-89.1, p<0.001). Diabetes (males 22.8% vs females 15.1%) and cardiovascular disease (males 58.9% vs females 47.8%) were statistically more common in males (p<0.001), while gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (males 20% vs females 24.6%) and major depressive illness (males 0.8% vs females 2.5%) were more common in females (p<0.001). Significantly, more females experienced symptoms for >24 months prior to first clinic appointment (females 40.1% vs males 36.6%, p=0.03). While more males in the cohort met eligibility criteria for antifibrotics at baseline (pirfenidone FVC 50%-80% males 54.7% vs females 47.6%, nintedanib FVC 50%-80% males 47.0% vs females 41.5%, p<0.001), a larger proportion chose not to commence antifibrotic treatment (males 47.0% vs females 29.6%, p<0.001). Female sex was associated with longer survival; for females, the 75% Kaplan-Meier survival quartile is 7.6 years (95% CI 5.51 to 9.68 years) versus 4.3 years (95% CI 3.82 to 4.78) for males (p<0.001). Male sex (HR 1.76 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.54), p=0.002), higher age (HR 1.042 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.06), p<0.001), lower baseline FVC % predicted (HR 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.98), p<0.001) and coexistent lung cancer (HR 9.3 (95% CI 2.86 to 30.24), p<0.001) were all independently associated with worse survival.

conclusionThis is the first UK study to use national registry data to systematically evaluate IPF disease characteristics stratifying by biological sex and highlights distinct characteristics between groups. Future clinical trials should explicitly explore sex-specific targeted interventions and analyses to optimise future IPF patient care.

Indexed as

Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisAgedAged, 80 and overAntifibrotic AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndolesMaleRegistriesRespiratory Function TestsSex FactorsSmokingTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnited KingdomVital CapacityAntifibrotic AgentsIndolesnintedanibIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisInterstitial Fibrosis

Identifiers

PMID40998463
PMCPMC12481391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.