ArticleBMJ open2025
Identifying evidence-based treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChildren and adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) experience exceptionally high levels of trauma, including experiencing multiple forms of abuse and witnessing violence. Exposure to such traumatic events may lead to the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or other health-related or behaviour-related harms. Untreated PTSD in adolescents results in significant impairments in their adaptive, social, emotional and academic functioning. To date, various intervention strategies have been developed internationally to reduce the severity of PTSD symptoms among children and adolescents. However, despite the documented mental health burden, there is limited evidence of culturally and contextually appropriate PTSD interventions in SSA. The objective of this scoping review is to investigate the evidence-based treatments available for adolescents diagnosed with PTSD in SAA. This investigation includes evaluating whether identified treatments were considered culturally and contextually appropriate. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will follow the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. This framework outlines six essential stages for conducting scoping reviews: (1) Defining the research question, (2) Locating pertinent studies, (3) Study selection, (4) Charting the data, (5) Collating, summarising and reporting the results and (6) Consulting with stakeholders. Findings will be presented using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Major databases, including PubMed (Medline), Scopus Academic Search Premier, Africa-Wide Information, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Education Resources Information Centre, Healthsource: Nursing/Academic, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES and SocINDEX will be searched. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will not involve the collection of primary data from human participants. While formal ethics approval is not required, permission to conduct the study has been obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of Cape Town. The results of the scoping review will be submitted to a relevant academic journal, including presentations at relevant conferences, to contribute to academic literature and inform future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.