Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40998430›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Perinatal outcomes and uptake of RSV vaccine during pregnancy in South London: a cross-sectional study.

Mohammad Sharif Razai, Erkan Kalafat, Smriti Prasad, Chelone Lee-Wo, Paul T Heath, Asma Khalil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammad Sharif RazaiPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK msr37@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6671-5557
Erkan KalafatDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Smriti PrasadVascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, City St George's, University of London, London, England, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2329-4470
Chelone Lee-WoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's NHS Trust, London, UK.
Paul T HeathVaccine Institute, Institute of Infection and Immunity, City St Georges, University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7540-7433
Asma KhalilVascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, City St George's, University of London, London, England, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2802-7670

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination has been introduced to protect infants from severe respiratory infections. However, its uptake and impact on perinatal outcomes are unknown in the UK.

objectivesTo evaluate uptake of RSV vaccine during pregnancy in a UK population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary maternity hospital in London. The participants included pregnant women who delivered between 1 September and 17 December 2024 (n=1157). For the analysis of vaccine uptake, the cohort included women eligible for vaccination who delivered beyond 28 weeks' gestation and were at 36 weeks or less on 1 September 2024 (n=911). The main outcome measures were RSV vaccine uptake and its association with sociodemographic factors, perinatal outcomes including preterm birth (PTB), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and stillbirth.

resultsOf 911 eligible women, 19% (n=173) received the RSV vaccine during pregnancy. Uptake increased significantly from 4% in September to 32% in December (p<0.001). Vaccinated women were older (median age 35 vs 32 years, p<0.001), more likely to be white (66.3% vs 46.5%, p<0.001), and from higher socioeconomic quintiles (Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile 5: 18.5% vs 11.2%, p=0.029). Smoking during pregnancy was less common in vaccinated women (0.6% vs 5.0%, p=0.016). Multivariable logistic regression identified older maternal age (p=0.001), higher socioeconomic status (IMD quintile 1 vs 5; adjusted OR (aOR) 0.28, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.81, p=0.030) and ethnicity (Asian: aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.88, p=0.015, black: aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.95, p=0.040, mixed: aOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.39, p=0.004) as independent predictors of vaccine uptake. PTB rates at <37 weeks were comparable between groups (9.6% vs 10.0%, p=0.980), but no vaccinated women experienced PTB<34 weeks compared with 3.2% of unvaccinated women (p=0.032). Caesarean section rates were higher among vaccinated women (52.0% vs 35.5%, p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in other perinatal outcomes.

conclusionsRSV vaccine uptake shows significant increases over time, with disparities in uptake by ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Further research is needed to increase vaccination rates, particularly in disadvantaged groups, and evaluate perinatal outcomes.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsRespiratory Syncytial Virus VaccinesVaccinationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLondonPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthYoung AdultRespiratory Syncytial Virus VaccinesImmunologyInfection controlPublic health

Identifiers

PMID40998430
PMCPMC12481338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.