ArticleBMJ open2025
Perinatal outcomes and uptake of RSV vaccine during pregnancy in South London: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with vaccination intentions and uptake among pregnant women in the UK: A scoping review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Association Between Maternal RSV Awareness and Vaccine Uptake.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Taxonomy of the Full Health and Societal Value of Maternal Vaccination to Prevent Infant Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of Maternal Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccination in Conferring Infant Immunity: Review and Future Perspectives.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Maternal vaccination service provision in London and Liverpool: Organisation, recording of vaccinations and midwife training.Future healthcare journal · 2025Article
- Sociodemographic Factors, Intent-Uptake Disparities, and Nirsevimab Availability in Infant RSV Immunoprophylaxis.Pediatric reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternal respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination has been introduced to protect infants from severe respiratory infections. However, its uptake and impact on perinatal outcomes are unknown in the UK.
objectivesTo evaluate uptake of RSV vaccine during pregnancy in a UK population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary maternity hospital in London. The participants included pregnant women who delivered between 1 September and 17 December 2024 (n=1157). For the analysis of vaccine uptake, the cohort included women eligible for vaccination who delivered beyond 28 weeks' gestation and were at 36 weeks or less on 1 September 2024 (n=911). The main outcome measures were RSV vaccine uptake and its association with sociodemographic factors, perinatal outcomes including preterm birth (PTB), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and stillbirth.
resultsOf 911 eligible women, 19% (n=173) received the RSV vaccine during pregnancy. Uptake increased significantly from 4% in September to 32% in December (p<0.001). Vaccinated women were older (median age 35 vs 32 years, p<0.001), more likely to be white (66.3% vs 46.5%, p<0.001), and from higher socioeconomic quintiles (Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile 5: 18.5% vs 11.2%, p=0.029). Smoking during pregnancy was less common in vaccinated women (0.6% vs 5.0%, p=0.016). Multivariable logistic regression identified older maternal age (p=0.001), higher socioeconomic status (IMD quintile 1 vs 5; adjusted OR (aOR) 0.28, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.81, p=0.030) and ethnicity (Asian: aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.88, p=0.015, black: aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.95, p=0.040, mixed: aOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.39, p=0.004) as independent predictors of vaccine uptake. PTB rates at <37 weeks were comparable between groups (9.6% vs 10.0%, p=0.980), but no vaccinated women experienced PTB<34 weeks compared with 3.2% of unvaccinated women (p=0.032). Caesarean section rates were higher among vaccinated women (52.0% vs 35.5%, p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in other perinatal outcomes.
conclusionsRSV vaccine uptake shows significant increases over time, with disparities in uptake by ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Further research is needed to increase vaccination rates, particularly in disadvantaged groups, and evaluate perinatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.