Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40998315›Full record

Trial reportJMIR formative research2025

User-Reported Mechanisms of Change on a Suicide Prevention Website: Single-Arm Pragmatic Trial.

Martina Fruhbauerova, David Huh, Ursula Whiteside

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martina FruhbauerovaDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6836-3236
David HuhNow Matters Now, Bellevue, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6357-4883
Ursula WhitesideNow Matters Now, Bellevue, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3218-1013

Funding

Randomized controlled trial of a single-session mechanism-focused intervention for suicidal thoughts and behaviorsF31MH135623 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI FRUHBAUEROVA, MARTINA · 2024 to 2025
$99k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH135623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital platforms can serve as effective interventions for individuals in crisis, those with limited access to mental health resources, or those who prefer web-based support over in-person care. NowMattersNow.org, a web-based platform grounded in dialectical behavior therapy, has been shown to reduce suicidal thoughts and negative emotions. However, little is known about the specific mechanisms that drive these improvements. Identifying the active ingredients that contribute to its effectiveness will help optimize its impact.

objectiveThis study examined the reasons users reported behind reductions in suicidal thoughts and negative emotions after visiting NowMattersNow.org. Specifically, this study sought to determine which reported reasons were associated with greater versus lesser improvements and whether these changes differed across specific subgroups.

methodsIn this single-arm pragmatic trial, data were collected from 3185 respondents who completed a 6-item retrospective survey while visiting NowMattersNow.org. The survey assessed changes in suicidal ideation and emotional distress (ie, intensity upon entering the site vs at the time of survey completion), reasons the website was helpful, and basic nonexclusive demographic information. Cross-tabulations were used to examine the most commonly endorsed reasons for finding the website helpful, while longitudinal regression analyses assessed the statistical significance of changes in suicidal ideation and emotional distress.

resultsThe majority of participants reported experiencing suicidal thoughts (n=2309, 72.5%) and negative emotions (n=2745, 86.2%) upon arriving at the website, with 52.4% (n=1211) and 55.6% (n=1527) of these individuals, respectively, experiencing reductions in suicidal thoughts and negative emotions after engaging with the site. Regarding the primary aims of the study, the most frequently cited reason for finding NowMattersNow.org helpful was "I learned something" (n=668, 21%), followed by "It distracted me" (n=544, 17.1%) and "I felt less alone" (n=414, 13%). These were also the top 3 reasons reported by LGBTQI individuals, those endorsing alcohol or opioid problems, and those experiencing unusual experiences, though the order varied across groups. Among participants who experienced the largest reduction in suicidal ideation (a 4-point decrease), the most common reasons cited were "It distracted me" (n=5, 29.4%), "I felt less alone" (n=3, 17.6%), and "I felt cared for" (n=3, 17.6%). Similarly, for those with the largest reduction in negative emotions (a 4-point decrease), the most frequently endorsed reasons were "It distracted me" (n=3, 23.1%), "I felt less alone" (n=3, 23.1%), and "I felt cared for" (n=2, 15.4%).

conclusionsThe findings suggest that NowMattersNow.org is an accessible, scalable digital intervention that shows promise for reducing suicidal ideation and emotional distress, particularly in vulnerable populations. Key elements, such as fostering social connectedness, distraction, and educational content, appear to be critical components of its effectiveness, indicating that web-based self-help tools like NowMattersNow.org can provide short-term management of suicidal thoughts and negative emotions.

Indexed as

Dialectical Behavior TherapyInternetInternet-Based InterventionSuicide PreventionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychological DistressRetrospective StudiesSuicidal IdeationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultbehavior therapycrisis interventiondialectical behavior therapydigital accessibility internetdigital mental healthhelp-seeking behaviorsuicidesuicide preventionweb-based interventions

Identifiers

PMID40998315
PMCPMC12511815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.