Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40998271›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2026

Performance of a Novel Frameless and Maskless Robotic Head Motion Compensation System for Stereotactic Radiosurgery in a Realistic Clinical Environment with Healthy Volunteers.

Xinmin Liu, Ahmad Sakaamini, Wenbo Gu, Carl Denis, Michelle Alonso-Basanta, Rodney D Wiersma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinmin LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Ahmad SakaaminiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Wenbo GuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Carl DenisCDR Systems, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Michelle Alonso-BasantaCDR Systems, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Rodney D WiersmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: rwiersma@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

Development of a portable and compact robotic system for frameless and maskless stereotactic radiosurgeryR01CA227124 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WIERSMA, RODNEY · 2019 to 2023
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a nonsurgical method for treating brain abnormalities and small tumors. Traditional high-accuracy SRS requires a rigid metal head frame screwed into the skull, which causes discomfort and reduces patient compliance. Thermoplastic masks offer a less invasive alternative but compromise accuracy because of flexing and are often still uncomfortable. To address these issues, we developed a novel robotic head motion compensation (RHMC) device that enables frameless and maskless SRS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A compact, portable RHMC device was developed that can be quickly attached to or detached from the end of a linear accelerator treatment table. Real-time 6° head position tracking was performed using 3-dimensional surface-guided radiation therapy imaging, which was fed into the robot control computer. Device performance was evaluated by administering virtual SRS treatments to a phantom and 20 healthy volunteers, simulating a clinical environment but without delivering radiation. The primary success metric was defined as maintaining the 6D target position under a 1.0 mm and 1.0° threshold for more than 95% of beam-on time (denoted as DC95%_1.0 mm and 1.0°).

resultsTwo of the 20 volunteers were excluded because of incompatibility with the RHMC device. Among the remaining 18 volunteers, the DC95%_1.0 mm and 1.0° success metric was achieved in all cases. Without the RHMC device, 9 of the 18 volunteers were able to meet this metric. For a tighter tolerance of DC95%_1.0 mm and 0.5°, 17 volunteers achieved the metric with the RHMC device, compared with 4 without. For a tolerance of 1.0 mm and 1.0°, across all 18 volunteers, the mean and range were 99% and 96% to 100% using the RHMC device, respectively, compared with 73% and 9% to 100% without the RHMC device.

conclusionsThe RHMC device effectively maintained accurate head motion control under simulated clinical conditions, achieving the DC95%_1.0 mm and 1.0° success metric for all suitable candidates. This technology has the potential to enable frameless and maskless SRS delivery within or better than current standard-of-care tolerance guidelines.

Indexed as

HeadHead MovementsRadiosurgeryRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultEquipment DesignFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMasksParticle AcceleratorsPatient PositioningPhantoms, Imaging

Identifiers

PMID40998271
PMCPMC13285718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.