ArticleNeuropharmacology2025
Evaluating the reinforcing properties of oxycodone and oxymorphone using intravenous drug self-administration in male rats.
Article in Neuropharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oxycodone, a commonly abused opioid, and its metabolite oxymorphone are agonists at the μ-opioid receptor. While oxymorphone is more potent, and clinical data suggests a greater abuse liability, there is little data comparing them in preclinical models. We examined their reinforcing properties using the intravenous (IV) self-administration method. Male Wistar Han rats were implanted with IV catheters and trained to lever press for infusions of oxycodone and oxymorphone. Dose response curves were assessed using fixed ratio (FR) 1, FR3, FR5 and progressive ratio (PR) schedules. Responding was then extinguished and drug priming-induced reinstatement, a model of relapse, was assessed. Microdialysis was used to assess central concentrations of oxymorphone following IV oxycodone. Under FR1 schedules, in both oxycodone and oxymorphone self-administering rats, active lever pressing and infusions earned decreased with increasing dose, while intake increased, however the shape of the dose response curves differed. Oxymorphone, compared to oxycodone, exhibited a leftward shift in the dose-response curve, indicative of higher potency, but also a shallower slope and lower maximal active lever pressing and infusions. On the PR schedule, the highest breakpoint was observed for oxymorphone. Oxycodone (0.25 mg/kg) induced significant drug-priming reinstatement after extinction, while an equipotent dose of oxymorphone (0.025 mg/kg) approached significant reinstatement. After a bolus IV injection of oxycodone, oxymorphone was present in the cerebrospinal fluid at approximately 1/250th the concentration of oxycodone. These findings highlight distinct self-administration patterns between oxycodone, which is metabolized to oxymorphone in vivo, and oxymorphone itself, suggesting differences beyond potency at the μ-opioid receptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.