ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025
High-Accuracy Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Using Improved Solvent Suppression Schemes.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaporation-free Supercritical Fluid Chromatography-Internal Standard Correction-Solvent Suppression-Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance for Chiral Separation and Quantification of Quinine.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
- Pure Gaussian Apodisation Reduces Integral Crosstalk Sensitivity in Quantitative NMR.Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) has contributed to reliable and accurate measurements of organic compounds enabling quantitation even when no standards of the specific compounds are available. Such high-accuracy determinations are critical across the field of analytical chemistry, with the advances in qNMR being of utmost importance in the production of reference standards for a range of organic compounds. The ability to perform these accurate measurements in the presence of natural isotopic abundance solvents is important for increasing throughput and expanding the number of applications that benefit. In this work, we have assessed several pulse sequences for solvent suppression. The limitations of NMR acquisitions in the presence of large solvent signals and solvent suppression such as limited dynamic range, losses due to relaxation and proximity to the solvent peak where quantitation starts failing were studied in depth and discussed. We have shown that binomial-like sequences produce the most robust and reliable results in the majority of scenarios and propose alternative sequences using modern pulses that produce satisfactory results in situations where the most accurate sequences are not applicable. We present the development and use of binomial-like pulses in an inversion-recovery sequence that allows T1 measurement in experiments without deuterated solvent (no-D NMR) to enable the use of correct repetition times for high-accuracy measurements under these conditions. Although the binomial-like sequences present the limitation of having secondary suppression notches, there is enough flexibility to adjust the position of those notches. Finally, we present a full measurement uncertainty budget estimation including all uncertainty allowances that are relevant when solvent suppression is used.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.