ArticleNutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)2026
Periconceptional glycemic index and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus and a large-for-gestational-age infant.
Article in Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between a Periconception Healthy Plant-Based Diet and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.The Journal of nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe determined whether the glycemic index (GI), a metric of dietary carbohydrate impact on blood glucose, in early pregnancy was associated with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or a large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infant among nulliparous individuals.
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of individuals without pregestational diabetes enrolled in the prospective United States-based Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-To-Be multisite cohort. The exposure was average periconceptual GI calculated from the Block Food Frequency Questionnaire. GI scores were categorized in quartiles from Q1 (best, reference) to Q4 (worst). Outcomes were diagnosis of GDM based on third-trimester screening and LGA birth per sex- and gestational-age standardized birthweight ≥90th percentile. Secondarily, we assessed for effect modification by dietary quality and neighborhood-level food access.
resultsAmong 7742 assessed participants, the median GI was 49.8 (IQR: 47.4, 52.1), and 94.9% had a low or favorable GI score (≤55). The highest quartile of GI was not associated with GDM (aRR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.85-1.62), but Q3 was associated with an increased risk of GDM versus Q1 (Q3 vs. Q1 5.0% vs 3.9%: aRR: 1.46, 95% CI 1.07-1.99). GI was not associated with an LGA infant. There was no evidence of effect modification by dietary quality or food access (P ≥ 0.05 for both).
conclusionsIn a prospective cohort of nulliparous individuals with predominantly low GI in early pregnancy, the GI was not consistently associated with GDM or LGA birth. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms by which diet-based glycemia may affect pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.