Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40997284›Full record

Trial reportNeurology2025

Effects of Phenytoin on the Retinal Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer in Acute Optic Neuritis: Analysis of a Phase II Randomized Trial.

Srikirti Kodali, Alessia Bianchi, Rhian Raftopoulos, Marcello Moccia, Anjaneya Prasad Malladi, Marios C Yiannakas, Magnus Fugger, Rebecca Sara Samson, Claudia Angela Michela Wheeler-Kingshott, Martin Koltzenburg and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01451593 (A Phase II Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial of Neuroprotection With Phenytoin in Acute Optic Neuritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01451593 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial of Neuroprotection With Phenytoin in Acute Optic Neuritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2011 to 2015Enrolled92ConditionsOptic Neuritis, Multiple SclerosisArmsPhenytoin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Srikirti KodaliDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Science, University College London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2960-5655
Alessia BianchiDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Science, University College London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5541-5818
Rhian RaftopoulosKings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Marcello MocciaDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Federico II University of Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2613-3090
Anjaneya Prasad MalladiDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Science, University College London, United Kingdom.
Marios C YiannakasDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Science, University College London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4986-446X
Magnus FuggerDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Science, University College London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca Sara SamsonDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Science, University College London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-702X
Claudia Angela Michela Wheeler-KingshottDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Science, University College London, United Kingdom.
Martin KoltzenburgDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Science, University College London, United Kingdom.
Ferran PradosDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Science, University College London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7872-0142
Simon HickmanSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1003-4370
Raju KapoorDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Science, University College London, United Kingdom.
Ahmed T ToosyDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Science, University College London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4441-3750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesAcute demyelinating optic neuritis (AON) can lead to irreversible neuroaxonal loss. We investigated the neuroprotective effects of phenytoin on macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness.

methodsWe reanalyzed Spectralis optical coherence tomography scans from the phenytoin AON trial (NCT01451593), a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial. Participants attended 2 trial centers in London or Sheffield, United Kingdom. Patients with unilateral AON, age 18-60 years, within 2 weeks of onset, with visual acuities 6/9 or worse, were randomly assigned (1:1) to oral phenytoin (4-6 mg/kg/d) or placebo for 3 months, stratified by onset time, center, previous multiple sclerosis diagnosis, disease-modifying treatment, and corticosteroid use. Macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thicknesses were extracted at baseline and 6 months. Linear regression models evaluated treatment effects on 6-month affected eye mGCIPL, adjusting for 6-month full-field visual evoked potential (VEP) latency and amplitude and baseline variables including mGCIPL thicknesses, steroid use, baseline acuity, and time interval to treatment. We also compared neuroprotective effects between peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and mGCIPL outcomes.

resultsEighty patients (39 phenytoin: 41 placebo) with a mean age of 33.59 years, 70% female, participated in this study. At 6 months, significant treatment effects were estimated for phenytoin vs placebo (affected eye mGCIPL thicker by 6.79 μm, DISCUSSION: This study supports superiority of the mGCIPL over the pRNFL as a neuroprotective marker after AON and demonstrates strong associations with myelination, providing additional mechanistic insights. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01451593; submitted for registration on October 11, 2011; first patient enrollment was on February 2, 2012. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that compared with placebo, phenytoin is associated with greater preservation of the mGCIPL thickness in patients with acute demyelinating optic neuropathy.

Indexed as

Neuroprotective AgentsOptic NeuritisPhenytoinRetinal Ganglion CellsAdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTomography, Optical CoherenceYoung AdultNeuroprotective AgentsPhenytoin

Identifiers

PMID40997284
PMCPMC12473176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.