ArticleJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
Evaluation of the National HIV Surveillance System: 2018-2023.
Article in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the United States' National HIV Surveillance System (NHSS), 2018-2023.
designSurveillance performance outcome standards were calculated by health departments using a SAS program provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and were reported to CDC through an annual report.
settingSubmitted data from 59 health departments including the 50 US states, the District of Columbia, 6 separately funded cities (Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles County, New York City, Philadelphia, and San Francisco), and 2 territories (Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands).
participantsCases of HIV reported to the health departments based on data reported through the end of each year, 2018-2023.
main outcome measuresOutcome standards included measures for case ascertainment, duplicate review, risk factor information, data quality, laboratory reporting, antiretroviral use history information, cause of death, previous negative test result, geocoding, and data dissemination.
resultsAchievement varied by standard with almost all health departments (HDs) meeting certain standards every year and fewer than 10 HDs achieving other standards.
conclusionsDuring the period of assessment, results showed steady and improved performance in several measures. Standards related to recent enhancements in the surveillance system were not as resilient and showed potential for improvement. Continued monitoring is necessary to ensure further strengthening of NHSS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.