ArticlePloS one2025
Interventions for treating posterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere are many different surgical and conservative interventions for treating posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries of the knee in adults. However, in the literature, there is no consensus regarding the best intervention for treating these patients. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyse the effectiveness of interventions (surgical and conservative) for treating PCL injuries of the knee in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Starting in November 2025, the authors will accomplish a detailed search using the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and LILACS databases. Relevant gray literature (academic papers, reference lists theses, technical reports and conference abstracts) will also be included. Two authors will independently screen and extract the information found from randomized controlled trials in the literature. The bias and quality of the included studies will be evaluated using the Risk of Bias 2 tool provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. Statistical analyses will be performed using Review Manager V.5.4/Review Manager Web software. DISCUSSION: This systematic review is aimed at providing practical information for Orthopaedic surgeons on the effectiveness of the interventions (surgical and conservative) for treating PCL injuries of the knee in adults. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023430493.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.