ArticlePloS one2025
Predicting stock returns using machine learning combined with data envelopment analysis and automatic feature engineering: A case study on the Vietnamese stock market.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In financial markets, predicting stock returns is an essential task for investors. This paper is one of the first studies using business efficiency scores calculated from data envelopment analysis to predict stock returns. In the meantime, this is also one of the first studies to comprehensively investigate the performance of machine learning models and automatic feature engineering techniques in the context of predicting returns in the Vietnamese stock market. Specifically, the data from 2019 to 2024 of 26 real-estate enterprises on Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange are collected. Based on relevant technical indicators, fundamental indicators, and business efficiency scores, a comparison of various machine learning models' performance is provided. The results indicate that incorporating business efficiency scores significantly enhances the models' accuracy. For example, the deep neural network model shows a decrease in RMSE from 0.926 to 0.375, MAE from 0.337 to 0.196, and MAPE from 134.63 to 114.71. Furthermore, the gradient boosted tree model, when combined with business efficiency scores and automatic feature engineering, achieves the best results, yielding an MAE of 0.122 and an MAPE of 103.19. The obtained results reveal a significant improvement in terms of accuracy when using the business efficiency score with the automated feature engineering technique.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.