Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40997128›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Equitable AI: Exploring the role of gender in poverty estimation models using geospatial data.

Seth Goodman, Katherine Nolan, Rachel Sayers, Ariel BenYishay, Jacob Hall, Mavis Zupork Dome, Edem Selormey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seth GoodmanAidData, Global Research Institute, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5138-9349
Katherine NolanAidData, Global Research Institute, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Rachel SayersAidData, Global Research Institute, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Ariel BenYishayAidData, Global Research Institute, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Jacob HallAidData, Global Research Institute, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0008-2020-8622
Mavis Zupork DomeGhana Center for Democratic Development, Accra, Ghana.
Edem SelormeyGhana Center for Democratic Development, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Household surveys have been the foundation for poverty measurement in developing countries for the past half-century, but the spatial and temporal gaps in these survey data often limit how well anti-poverty programs can be targeted, monitored, or evaluated. To fill in these gaps, analysts and policymakers increasingly turn to machine learning (ML) methods to predict indices of asset wealth from satellite-based and other geospatial data. However, to date, the potential for gender-related differences in these methods' performance has not been investigated. We implement a frequently used class of ML models (random forests) relying on readily accessible geospatial data and trained on and validated against a widely used source of asset holdings (a recent round of the Demographic & Health Survey in Ghana). By separately aggregating the asset holdings of female- and male-headed households within each survey cluster, we are able to estimate the distinctions in performance of ML models trained on each of these gender-based asset indices. We find that models trained on data from male-headed households achieve an impressive level of predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.85), while those trained on data from female-headed households achieve reasonable but notably lower accuracy (R2 = 0.75). Roughly half of this gap appears to be driven in large part by the relatively smaller number of female-headed households in the survey sample. While we cannot rule out that the ML models themselves play a role in creating differences in performance across gender, it appears that these gaps may largely be a reflection of the sampling designs of the underlying survey data used as inputs for these models. Our findings confirm that ML models can be used to extend the spatial and temporal scope of these survey data to populations that were not randomly sampled, even while encouraging larger samples of female-headed households in survey designs to improve the predictive accuracy of ML models for female-headed households.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPovertyDeveloping CountriesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleGhanaHumansMaleSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID40997128
PMCPMC12463281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.