ArticlePloS one2025
The impact of heterogeneous interpersonal relationships on promoting cooperation under the reputation mechanisms in public goods game.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the principle of "case-by-case analysis" is widely endorsed, achieving complete rationality in the real world continues to be fraught with difficulties. Interpersonal relationships are heterogeneous, and the influence of social relationships and worldly wisdom on reputation evaluation should not be overlooked. Therefore, based on indirect reciprocity theory, this paper constructs a public goods game model with strategy update rules driven by reputation mechanism, aiming to investigate the impact of heterogeneous interpersonal relationships on the promotion of cooperative public goods provision among residents. The paper categorizes interpersonal relationships into three types, and proposes three corresponding reputation evaluation rules. Simulation results demonstrate that varying intensities of interpersonal relationships result in different levels of cooperation. When conducting public activities, externalities and the organizational efficiency of managers must be considered. Meanwhile, cooperation is difficult to sustain if the reputation mechanism fails to function effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.