Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40997103›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Identification of physiological adverse events using continuous vital signs monitoring during paediatric critical care transport: A novel data-driven approach.

Milan Kapur, Kezhi Li, Alexander Brown, Zhiqiang Huo, Philip Knight, Gwyneth Davies, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Milan KapurDepartment of Population, Policy and Practice, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0190-8163
Kezhi LiInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexander BrownDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3214-7977
Zhiqiang HuoWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Philip KnightChildren's Acute Transport Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Gwyneth DaviesDepartment of Population, Policy and Practice, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Padmanabhan RamnarayanChildren's Acute Transport Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interhospital transport of critically unwell children exacerbates physiological stress, increasing the risk of deterioration during transport. Due to the nature of illness and interventions occurring in this cohort, defining "normal" vital sign ranges is impossible, which can make identifying deterioration events difficult. A novel data-driven approach was developed to identify adverse respiratory and cardiovascular events in critically ill children during interhospital transport. In this retrospective cohort study of 1,519 transports (July 2016 to May 2021), vital signs were recorded at one-second intervals and then analysed using an adaptation of Bollinger Bands, a technique borrowed from financial market analysis. This method dynamically established each patient's stable ranges for heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and other respiratory parameters, and flagged adverse events when multiple parameters simultaneously fell outside their expected ranges. Adverse respiratory events were identified when oxygen saturation deviated below a dynamically defined threshold alongside at least one additional respiratory parameter. Cardiovascular events were defined by concurrent deviations in blood pressure and heart rate. Overall, 15.6 percent of transports had one or more adverse respiratory events, and 21.5 percent had at least one adverse cardiovascular event. To validate these labels, the number of adverse events and the cumulative duration of vital sign instability during transport were compared against clinical markers of deterioration. Each additional respiratory event was associated with increased odds of receiving respiratory support during transport and higher 30-day mortality, while each additional cardiovascular event was associated with increased odds of receiving vasoactive support during transport. Our method detects respiratory and cardiovascular adverse events during transport. The approach is readily adaptable to other high-resolution intensive care datasets, for both retrospective labelling as well as automated, real-time identification of adverse events in the clinical setting, offering a foundation for improved monitoring and early intervention in critically ill patients.

Identifiers

PMID40997103
PMCPMC12463272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.