ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Identification of physiological adverse events using continuous vital signs monitoring during paediatric critical care transport: A novel data-driven approach.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interhospital transport of critically unwell children exacerbates physiological stress, increasing the risk of deterioration during transport. Due to the nature of illness and interventions occurring in this cohort, defining "normal" vital sign ranges is impossible, which can make identifying deterioration events difficult. A novel data-driven approach was developed to identify adverse respiratory and cardiovascular events in critically ill children during interhospital transport. In this retrospective cohort study of 1,519 transports (July 2016 to May 2021), vital signs were recorded at one-second intervals and then analysed using an adaptation of Bollinger Bands, a technique borrowed from financial market analysis. This method dynamically established each patient's stable ranges for heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and other respiratory parameters, and flagged adverse events when multiple parameters simultaneously fell outside their expected ranges. Adverse respiratory events were identified when oxygen saturation deviated below a dynamically defined threshold alongside at least one additional respiratory parameter. Cardiovascular events were defined by concurrent deviations in blood pressure and heart rate. Overall, 15.6 percent of transports had one or more adverse respiratory events, and 21.5 percent had at least one adverse cardiovascular event. To validate these labels, the number of adverse events and the cumulative duration of vital sign instability during transport were compared against clinical markers of deterioration. Each additional respiratory event was associated with increased odds of receiving respiratory support during transport and higher 30-day mortality, while each additional cardiovascular event was associated with increased odds of receiving vasoactive support during transport. Our method detects respiratory and cardiovascular adverse events during transport. The approach is readily adaptable to other high-resolution intensive care datasets, for both retrospective labelling as well as automated, real-time identification of adverse events in the clinical setting, offering a foundation for improved monitoring and early intervention in critically ill patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.