Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40997071›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Measurement accuracy of CT systems: The importance of calibration phantoms.

Jan Scherberich, Anton G Windfelder, Jessica Steinbart, Gabriele A Krombach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan ScherberichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Experimental Radiology), University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1117-4287
Anton G WindfelderDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Experimental Radiology), University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.
Jessica SteinbartDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Experimental Radiology), University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.
Gabriele A KrombachDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Experimental Radiology), University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the measurement accuracy of computed tomography (CT) systems, focusing on the necessity of using calibration phantoms for enhanced precision. Both clinical CT and micro-CT systems were evaluated using a specially designed two-ball phantom, which provides a reliable reference for spatial resolution and geometric accuracy. The study involved scanning the phantom with two micro-CT devices (the oversize micro-CT SkyScan 1173 and the high-resolution micro-CT SkyScan 1272) and a clinical CT device, a third-generation dual-source CT scanner (SOMATOM Force), measuring the distance between the centres of two ruby balls. The results showed significant differences in measurement accuracy between the devices. The high-resolution micro-CT provided the most consistent measurements with minimal variance, indicating its superiority in applications requiring high precision. In contrast, the oversize micro-CT exhibited larger errors, particularly at smaller voxel sizes, suggesting that internal calibration affected its accuracy. The dual source CT system had the smallest mean error but a larger standard deviation, indicating less consistency compared to micro-CT systems. Calibration with the two-ball phantom improved measurement accuracy across all devices. This improvement underscores the importance of using calibration phantoms to ensure accurate measurements, especially in fields that require high precision, such as clinical diagnostics and materials science. We concluded that routine calibration with phantoms is essential to achieve high measurement accuracy in CT imaging, thereby increasing the reliability of CT-based analyses in various disciplines.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedX-Ray MicrotomographyCalibrationHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID40997071
PMCPMC12463237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.