Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40997036›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Tobacco, electronic nicotine delivery system, nicotine replacement therapy, and cannabinoid use during pregnancy: A descriptive cross-sectional survey.

Sreemanjari Kandhasamy, Stéphanie Baggio, Jérôme Mathis, Yolanda Mattmann, Emeline Maisonneuve, Reto Auer, Alice Panchaud, Stephen P Jenkinson, Anna Schoeni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sreemanjari KandhasamyInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0087-9657
Stéphanie BaggioInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jérôme MathisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Bienne, Bienne, Switzerland.
Yolanda MattmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Bienne, Bienne, Switzerland.
Emeline MaisonneuveInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Reto AuerInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Alice PanchaudInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Stephen P JenkinsonInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8276-7082
Anna SchoeniInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-5925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTobacco smoking is associated with adverse health outcomes for both pregnant women and their offspring. Smoking cessation counseling is an effective method to help women quit smoking. Developing a targeted smoking cessation intervention could benefit those who struggle to quit tobacco and potentially reduce the harm due to any co-occurring tobacco use. Assessing the prevalence of tobacco, electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and cannabinoid use in pregnancy is key to developing such interventions. Thus, we aimed to assess the prevalence and patterns of tobacco, ENDS, NRT, and cannabinoid use in pregnancy. We further aimed to assess the prevalence of smoking cessation counseling intervention. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey among pregnant women attending regular clinical visits at Spitalzentrum Biel between February and May 2023 (n = 262). Frequency and proportion along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for tobacco, ENDS, NRT, and cannabinoid use in pregnancy.

resultsTobacco use was reported among 7.6% (20/262, 95% CI: 4.2%-11.1%) of the included pregnant women. Tobacco cigarettes (conventional or roll-on) were used by 7.3% (19/262, 95% CI: 3.8%-10.7%) of the surveyed pregnant women, with 0.8% (2/262, 95% CI: 0.0%-3.4%) of them reporting use of cigarettes along with ENDS and 0.4% (1/262, 95% CI: 0.0%-3.8%) reporting use of the cigarettes with NRT. Cannabinoid use was reported by 3.8% (10/262, 95% CI: 1.1%-7.0%) of pregnant women and all of them used products with Cannabidiol (CBD) only. Additionally, only 25% (5/20, 95% CI: 10.0%-48.3%) of tobacco users had received smoking cessation counseling intervention.

conclusionThe estimated prevalence of tobacco, ENDS, NRT, and cannabinoid use among the pregnant women in this survey was 7.6%, 0.8%, 0.4%, and 3.8% respectively. However, among tobacco users, only one-fourth received smoking cessation counseling intervention.

Indexed as

CannabinoidsElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationTobacco Use Cessation DevicesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansNicotine Replacement TherapyPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCannabinoids

Identifiers

PMID40997036
PMCPMC12463284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.