ArticleDevelopmental neuroscience2025
Comparative Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis of c-Met Receptor Expressing and Non-Expressing Projection Neurons in the Developing Frontal and Visual Cortices.
Article in Developmental neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSingle-cell transcriptomic analyses in adult mice show that cortical projection neuron subclasses exhibit heterogenous gene expression profiles that reflect their projection targets and laminar and areal positions. Further analyses revealed that projection neurons within the same subclass also exhibit transcriptomic heterogeneity. Recent evidence suggests that differences in maturation state reflect one source of this heterogeneity. The MET receptor tyrosine kinase, a regulator of synapse maturation, is expressed in a subpopulation within cortical projection neuron subclasses, providing an experimental model to address transcriptomic heterogeneity within developing projection neuron subclasses.
methodsSingle-cell RNA sequencing and smFISH were used to identify transcriptomic differences between Met+ and Met- projection neuron populations in the mouse visual and frontal cortices during the early phase of synapse formation and dendritic growth.
resultsAnalyses confirmed enrichment of Met in select projection neuron subclasses and further identified astrocytes as the major source of its ligand, Hgf. No genes were expressed uniquely in Met+ or Met- projection neurons within a subclass; rather, there were graded differences in gene expression between the populations. While the identity of differentially expressed genes varied between subclass and cortical area, there was a consistent overrepresentation of genes associated with axon growth, as well as synapse structure, development, and function, with a subset associated with the MET interactome. Further, compared to Met- projection neurons, expression differences in genes associated with maturation indicate less mature excitatory synapses and spines in the Met+ population at this age.
conclusionThe current findings provide support for the hypothesis that Met+ projection neurons are in a less mature state than Met- projection neurons within the same subclass. Further, the data are consistent with converging lines of biochemical and electrophysiological evidence that MET contributes to asynchronous maturation of developing cortical circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.