ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2025
Empirical substitution models of protein evolution: database, relationships, and modeling considerations.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterization ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Substitution models of protein evolution describe the patterns of amino acid substitutions over evolutionary time and are fundamental for probabilistic methods of phylogenetic inference. At the protein level, a variety of substitution models are available, but only empirical substitution models are well established in phylogenetics due to their mathematical simplicity. Despite their importance, a database compiling the large number of currently available empirical substitution models of protein evolution is lacking, although such a resource could facilitate access, assessment, and subsequent implementation of these models into phylogenetic frameworks. Besides, little is known about formal comparisons between the current set of empirical substitution models. We present EModelDB, a database of empirical substitution models of protein evolution required for probabilistic protein phylogenetics that includes the corresponding exchangeability matrices, model classification, and model-specific biological information. The database is integrated into a graphical user interface, written in Python and SQL, that facilitates its usability. We also compared common empirical substitution models in terms of the distance between their relative rates of amino acid substitution and amino frequencies at equilibrium. We found that substitution models derived from proteins related in nature tend to cluster together, reflecting similar evolutionary patterns. Indeed, we evaluated the empirical substitution models in terms of the folding stability of the derived modeled proteins and found that they generally produce less stable proteins compared to real proteins, suggesting that substitution models with additional evolutionary constraints can be preferred for studying protein evolution accounting for folding stability. Database URL: https://github.com/Paula-Iglesias-Rivas/EModelDB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.