Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40996686›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025

Content analysis of PROMIS physical function banks using the international classification of functioning, disability and health.

Michelle M Langer, Kathryn C Nesbit, Alex Dien, Theresa Jaramillo, Sang S Pak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Exploring Current Procedural Terminology Codes for Physical Therapist Evaluations in the United States: Results of a Feasibility Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle M LangerDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kathryn C NesbitDepartment of Physical Therapy, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alex DienDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Services, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Theresa JaramilloDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Services, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sang S PakDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Services, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. sam.pak@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9964-3350

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study links the current version of the PROMIS Physical Function bank, including its Mobility and Upper Extremity sub-banks, to the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and health (ICF). This research aims to enhance interpretability and applicability of these measures across healthcare and research settings by establishing a common language between PROMIS and ICF.

methods165 items from PROMIS Physical Function v2.0, Mobility v2.1, and Upper Extremity v2.1 banks were mapped to ICF codes at primary, second, and third levels. Two investigators independently coded items, with a referee for consensus. Inter-rater reliability was assessed to evaluate coder agreement, and content composition was analyzed through frequencies of mapped ICF codes.

resultsMapping achieved substantial inter-rater reliability (α = 0.79–0.88). "D4 Mobility" was the most represented ICF chapter across banks, with the Mobility bank having the highest proportion (93%). The Physical Function bank covered seven primary ICF chapters, dominated by "D4 Mobility" (69%) and "D5 Self-care" (12%). The Mobility and Upper Extremity banks showed distinct content focuses within the broader physical function domain.

conclusionThis analysis reveals broad ICF concept coverage in PROMIS Physical Function banks, primarily of Mobility and Self-care. The mapping enables clinicians to understand PROMIS content using familiar ICF terminology and supports goal-setting that integrates both frameworks. These capabilities enable innovative clinical care and customized measurement approaches. While acknowledging limitations, this work provides a foundation for integrated, patient-centered care and outcomes research.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthPersons with DisabilitiesActivities of Daily LivingHumansReproducibility of ResultsUpper ExtremityContent validityFunctional measurementInternational classification of functioning (ICF)Patient-centered carePROMIS physical function

Identifiers

PMID40996686
PMCPMC12681486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.