ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025
Content analysis of PROMIS physical function banks using the international classification of functioning, disability and health.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Current Procedural Terminology Codes for Physical Therapist Evaluations in the United States: Results of a Feasibility Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study links the current version of the PROMIS Physical Function bank, including its Mobility and Upper Extremity sub-banks, to the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and health (ICF). This research aims to enhance interpretability and applicability of these measures across healthcare and research settings by establishing a common language between PROMIS and ICF.
methods165 items from PROMIS Physical Function v2.0, Mobility v2.1, and Upper Extremity v2.1 banks were mapped to ICF codes at primary, second, and third levels. Two investigators independently coded items, with a referee for consensus. Inter-rater reliability was assessed to evaluate coder agreement, and content composition was analyzed through frequencies of mapped ICF codes.
resultsMapping achieved substantial inter-rater reliability (α = 0.79–0.88). "D4 Mobility" was the most represented ICF chapter across banks, with the Mobility bank having the highest proportion (93%). The Physical Function bank covered seven primary ICF chapters, dominated by "D4 Mobility" (69%) and "D5 Self-care" (12%). The Mobility and Upper Extremity banks showed distinct content focuses within the broader physical function domain.
conclusionThis analysis reveals broad ICF concept coverage in PROMIS Physical Function banks, primarily of Mobility and Self-care. The mapping enables clinicians to understand PROMIS content using familiar ICF terminology and supports goal-setting that integrates both frameworks. These capabilities enable innovative clinical care and customized measurement approaches. While acknowledging limitations, this work provides a foundation for integrated, patient-centered care and outcomes research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.