Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40996679›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026

Impact of visually identified in-stent protrusion on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Taku Kasahara, Kenichi Sakakura, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Yousuke Taniguchi, Kei Yamamoto, Takunori Tsukui, Masashi Hatori, Yusuke Watanabe, Shun Ishibashi, Masaru Seguchi and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Taku KasaharaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama City, 330-8503, Japan.
Kenichi SakakuraDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama City, 330-8503, Japan. ksakakura@jichi.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3566-0394
Hiroyuki JinnouchiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama City, 330-8503, Japan.
Yousuke TaniguchiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama City, 330-8503, Japan.
Kei YamamotoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama City, 330-8503, Japan.
Takunori TsukuiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama City, 330-8503, Japan.
Masashi HatoriDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama City, 330-8503, Japan.
Yusuke WatanabeDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama City, 330-8503, Japan.
Shun IshibashiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama City, 330-8503, Japan.
Masaru SeguchiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama City, 330-8503, Japan.
Hideo FujitaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama City, 330-8503, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-stent protrusion is sometimes observed after the stent implantation to the culprit lesion of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, it remains unclear whether additional interventions are necessary for non-obstructive in-stent protrusions. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with STEMI between with and without angiographically visible in-stent protrusions, and to evaluate the association between angiographically visible in-stent protrusions and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI. We included 639 patients with STEMI who underwent stent implantation and divided them into the protrusion group (n = 59) and the clear stent group (n = 580). In-stent protrusion was defined as an angiographically visible in-stent contrast filling defect at final angiography. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which were defined as the composite of all cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. During the median follow-up duration of 620 (213-1379) days, MACE were more frequently observed in the protrusion group than in the clear stent group (p = 0.002). The multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that in-stent protrusion was significantly associated with MACE after controlling for multiple confounding factors (HR 2.373, 95% CI 1.311-4.294, p = 0.004). In conclusion, angiographically visible in-stent contrast filling defect at final angiography is a marker for worse clinical outcomes in primary PCI. When interventional cardiologists recognize visible irregular protrusion after stent implantation for STEMI, additional intervention or careful clinical follow up may be needed.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionStentsAgedCoronary AngiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAcute myocardial infarctionIn-stent protrusionST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.