ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Impact of visually identified in-stent protrusion on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In-stent protrusion is sometimes observed after the stent implantation to the culprit lesion of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, it remains unclear whether additional interventions are necessary for non-obstructive in-stent protrusions. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with STEMI between with and without angiographically visible in-stent protrusions, and to evaluate the association between angiographically visible in-stent protrusions and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI. We included 639 patients with STEMI who underwent stent implantation and divided them into the protrusion group (n = 59) and the clear stent group (n = 580). In-stent protrusion was defined as an angiographically visible in-stent contrast filling defect at final angiography. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which were defined as the composite of all cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. During the median follow-up duration of 620 (213-1379) days, MACE were more frequently observed in the protrusion group than in the clear stent group (p = 0.002). The multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that in-stent protrusion was significantly associated with MACE after controlling for multiple confounding factors (HR 2.373, 95% CI 1.311-4.294, p = 0.004). In conclusion, angiographically visible in-stent contrast filling defect at final angiography is a marker for worse clinical outcomes in primary PCI. When interventional cardiologists recognize visible irregular protrusion after stent implantation for STEMI, additional intervention or careful clinical follow up may be needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40996679What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.