ArticleOdontology2026
Erosive potential of Kombuchas: an in vitro study in an oral cavity simulator.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Kombucha is a fermented, sweet and acidic beverage, belonging to the functional beverage market. This study aimed to evaluate the erosive potential of Kombucha against dental hard tissues using an erosion/abrasion (EA) cycling promoted by a new laboratory multifunctional oral cavity simulator (MOCS). This in vitro study used a preclinical simulator to evaluate surface loss (step height) in bovine enamel and dentin specimens. The study design comprised two brands of Kombucha commercially available in the Brazilian market (experiment 1, DÊVI Kombucha; experiment 2, Tao Kombucha), three groups (negative control/water; positive control/Coca-Cola; test group/Kombucha), and two teeth substrates (enamel and dentin), with nine specimens per group (108 in total). The EA cycling consisted of exposure 3x/day for 10 min to the solutions (0.25 mL/min); toothbrushing (abrasion) 2x/day with fluoridated dentifrice (NaF; 1100 ppm) and with a soft bristle toothbrush; constant flow of artificial saliva during the day (0.2 mL/min) and overnight (0.04 mL/min). After 5 days of EA cycling, dentin/enamel surface loss/step height was measured by optical profilometry. Regarding the tested Kombuchas, DÊVI induced less surface loss than Coca-Cola, whereas the surface loss induced by Tao and Coca-Cola was similar. All tested drinks induced greater surface loss than the negative control. Among the substrates, surface loss was lower in dentin. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the Kombuchas tested may have erosive potential causing significant loss of tooth structure. The regular consumption of Kombucha might expose dental hard tissues to an increased risk for erosive tooth wear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40996613What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.