ArticleInsights into imaging2025
Image-guided biopsy of breast lesions-when to use what biopsy technique.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- MMBCFNet: multi modal hybrid deep learning framework for breast cancer detection using MRI, mammography, and ultrasound images.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Article
- Cavity Margins Sample Shaving as Part of Extended Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: A Potential Approach to Predict Percutaneous Breast Cancer Excision.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Vacuum-assisted versus core needle breast biopsy: if only we knew more.European radiology · 2026Article
- Hematolymphoid neoplasms involving the breast: A single institution clinicopathologic study of 59 patients.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Environmental sustainability of ultrasound-guided core-needle breast biopsy: a survey on current practices by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Case Report: Colonic metastasis from mixed breast carcinoma masquerading as abemaciclib-associated diarrhea.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Image-guided biopsy of breast lesions-when to use what biopsy technique: the United States and Canadian perspective.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Antipsychotic-Associated Galactorrhea May Mask Diffuse Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: A Diagnostic Challenge.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, minimally invasive diagnostic options for breast lesions have expanded, but consensus on optimal biopsy techniques and imaging combinations remains lacking. This study, driven by an adapted RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method and insights from eight experts in breast biopsy from across the world, aims to create consensus for selecting biopsy techniques. Highlighted findings suggest Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB) for lesions visible exclusively at mammography/tomosynthesis (with or without contrast enhancement) or MRI. Core-needle biopsy (CNB) takes precedence for masses over 5 mm visible under US. The selection of other biopsy techniques during US-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. VAB is preferred for smaller masses (< 5 mm), complex cystic and solid lesions with small solid parts, small intraductal masses, architectural distortions, and calcifications visible on US. In re-biopsy scenarios for inconclusive findings or high-risk lesions, the panel suggests two VAB extensions: Extended Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (EVAB) for unambiguous lesion classification and Vacuum-Assisted Excision (VAE) for complete lesion removal. Furthermore, the panel provides detailed input on how to handle specific cases, such as re-biopsy for lobular neoplasia, flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Surgical excision is advised for DCIS and benign or borderline phyllodes tumors found through initial CNB or VAB. In conclusion, an international expert group formulated recommendations on diagnostic breast biopsies under image guidance, aiming to ensure accurate diagnosis worldwide by providing practical advice on needle selection and biopsy approach. KEY POINTS: Evidence-based literature on the preferred biopsy technique and imaging combination for the diagnosis of breast lesions is sparse, and a general consensus is not available. The selection of biopsy technique for different image-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. This international expert panel consensus statement addresses standard approaches for varying biopsy indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.